Dec
03
2009
Human Haploid Cell Line Identifies Potential Drug Targets
Posted by SR in News, tags: target identification
Image: Wikimedia Commons
As well as allowing the identification of genes involved in susceptibility to infection by bacteria and viruses, the mutagenized KBM7 cells could be used to study other disease-associated molecular networks where a distinct phenotype exists.
The study is published in Science.
Related posts:
- siRNA Experiments Identify Ebola Virus Drug Targets Antiviral drugs that exclusively target viral factors rather than host cell processes offer the possibility of fewer side effects but...
- Three New Kinase Targets for Alzheimer’s Disease Neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and correlate strongly with synaptic loss and severity of...
- Discovery Could Lead to Better Treatment for Bacterial Meningitis Meningitis – infection of the cerebrospinal fluid and protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord – can be caused...
- Rhes Protein Linked to Cell Death in Huntington’s Disease Huntington’s disease (HD) is an inherited neurological disorder that causes a wide range of symptoms including involuntary movements, clumsiness, lack...
- New Drug Target for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive, debilitating disease characterised by increased resistance in pulmonary arteries, placing additional workload...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
This entry was posted on Thursday, December 3rd, 2009 at 8:49 am and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
















Entries (RSS)
Was talking with a biochem friend about this article and the utility of haploid human cell lines. They definitely took issue with the sentence “…have now developed a human cell line, KBM7…” as evidently this cell line was developed a decade ago at Tufts, link below.
doi:10.1006/excr.1999.4656
Thanks for pointing out the error in our article – now corrected.